Sunday, September 30, 2018

Which civilization was the equivalent of America in the ancient world?

Very interesting question. There are several levels at which this can be analyzed.

The United States today is a large, pluralistic society and a constitutional republic. It has a separation of powers, with many institutions operating along democratic lines at the local, state, and federal levels. Its value system can be understood as a fusion of Greek rationalism, Scottish Enlightenment empiricism, and Judeo-Christian ethics. Economically, the United States operates primarily through free-market systems, tempered by various public-sector institutions and government regulations.

When these attributes are considered together, they make the United States a rather unique and continuing experiment in the history of our species.

Having said that, it is still worthwhile drawing comparisons, particularly in the realms of international influence, the exercise of power, and cultural reach. With this in mind, I would argue that four ancient civilizations bear some comparison with the United States.

a. Ancient Egypt

Ancient Egypt dominated much of North Africa and exerted considerable influence over the politics of the Levant, particularly during various periods of the second millennium and early first millennium BC. Together with Mesopotamia, Egypt can be regarded as one of the primordial drivers of the civilizations that ultimately contributed to what we now call the Western tradition.

b. Ancient Greece

The Greek city-state model, existing within a broader Hellenic civilization, offers a loose analogy with the state-federal model that defines the United States. I agree that the analogy has significant limitations: the Greek poleis were highly decentralized and often fiercely independent, and there was nothing resembling the modern American federal government until the Hellenistic period brought much greater political consolidation under Macedonian rule.

Nevertheless, Greek civilization exercised an enormous influence across the Mediterranean and provided a major intellectual and cultural counterweight to the civilizations of the East. Its achievements in philosophy, science, political thought, art, literature, and architecture continued to resonate long after the political independence of the individual city-states had declined. In terms of intellectual accomplishment and cultural reach, there are certainly parallels with the United States.

c. Ancient Rome

The Roman Republic provides perhaps the most obvious political comparison with the United States. Its republican institutions, separation of political powers, elected magistrates, representative bodies, and tradition of civic virtue exerted a profound influence on the American Founding Fathers. This is, of course, no coincidence.

The later Roman Empire was fundamentally different from the American constitutional system, but Rome's ability to project military, political, economic, and cultural power across an enormous geographic area made it the great superpower of its age. At the height of its power, Rome was largely unrivaled militarily within the Mediterranean world and exercised enormous influence over the economic and political structures of the territories under its control.

d. The Achaemenid Persian Empire

Before the rise of Macedon and the Hellenistic world, the Achaemenid Persian Empire was the dominant power across much of the Near East and the largest empire the ancient world had yet seen. It is particularly interesting as a comparison because of its ability to govern an extraordinarily diverse population while generally allowing considerable latitude in local customs, religions, and traditions.

Persia incorporated an enormous variety of peoples and belief systems into a common imperial framework. Although this tolerance had practical political limits and should not be confused with modern liberal pluralism, the Persian approach to governing diversity provides an interesting point of comparison with the multicultural character of the modern United States.

Even after considering all four of these civilizations—and putting aside obvious distinctions such as monarchy, dynastic rule, slavery, and various forms of autocratic government—I would argue that the United States remains distinct.

Unlike these ancient powers, the American Republic has not been primarily defined by a continuous need to expand and maintain an imperial territorial system beyond its core nation-state. There have certainly been periods of American imperialism, territorial expansion, intervention, and occupation, and these should not be minimized. The United States has exercised enormous power abroad and has at times pursued policies that can reasonably be described as imperialistic.

Yet there is an important distinction in the long-term structure of American power. The United States has generally been reluctant to maintain a traditional empire based upon the permanent occupation and direct administration of foreign territories. Its historical tendency, particularly after the Second World War, has been toward the creation of alliances, spheres of influence, economic relationships, military partnerships, and international institutions rather than the formal annexation and permanent administration of large overseas territories.

This is an important distinction from the great imperial civilizations of antiquity. Egypt, Persia, Greece in its Hellenistic form, and especially Rome expanded through the conquest and incorporation of territories and peoples into political structures ultimately controlled by the imperial center.

The United States, by contrast, has exercised much of its global influence without creating a conventional territorial empire on the Roman model. Its power has rested not only upon military strength but also upon economic influence, technological innovation, cultural reach, institutional alliances, and the attraction of its political and economic model.

That does not make the United States an entirely non-imperial power. Rather, it makes the form of American power historically unusual. It is a republic that became a global superpower without fully transforming itself into a conventional empire.

That distinction, in my view, is essential when comparing the United States with the great civilizations of antiquity.


No comments: