Showing posts with label Speculation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Speculation. Show all posts

Saturday, August 16, 2025

The State of the World at Present - Part 1 - The US

 The United States

1. The United States is a deeply divided country but still remains as the best hope for the West

2. Both the Republican and Democratic Parties are bleeding support from their traditional center to the Populit voices at the extremes. MAGA dominates the former and the far left is increasingly calling the shots with the latter. In each case the normative center is being squeezed.

3. Globalist forces  have less of a stranglehold in the United States than they do in Western Europe but the country is being pulled strongly in two opposing directions. It remains to be seen if the center will hold. 

4. Large Urban centers are facing a rot bought about by the Fentanyl Epidemic, poor city governance, corruption, white flight, a drop in law and order and illegal immigration that has run rampant. The Far Left dominates most of the power structures in the immediate center with corporate investment moving outward.

5. Gen Z is being radicalized by both the far left (socialism, Communism etc) and radical right (fascism). Identity politics of both an ethnic and religious type have infused both sides.Radicals are driven by romantic ideals that are dismissive of the necessary complement of empricism and racism that has historically definted the classical liberal and Burkean conservative heritage of the nation.

6. The trajecctory has a negative prognosis unless cooler and more calculating heads can prevail. There is an urgent need for an emergent and non-compromised centrism.

7. Donald Trump is a divisive President but so were Messrs Bush II, Obama and Biden. However Trunp's policies on reinforcing border control, rolling back DEI and flexing US muscle against his BRICS adversaries is most welcome. Whether these policies hold for the reamainder of his term or are reversed by a future Democratic Party leadership remains to be seen.

8. Without a strong US on the global front international politics will be dominated by China, Russia and the various Middle Eastern powers. This will likely lead to more turmoil. US hegemony is not a perfect solution (far from it) but it is a better option than the alternatives of America rebranding itself as a European analogue (viz. Germany, France or Britain) or even worse still adopting an American First policy that will needlessly empower authoritarian forces across the globe.



.

Friday, July 11, 2025

After Death Possiblities

What happens to us after we die?

I have absolutely no idea. Although I figure it will be one of these ten situations.

1.      We cease to exist completely in all dimensions.

2.      We are recycled and reborn as humans somewhere else on Earth.

3.      We join with a singularity so that our consciousness becomes one with the new medium.

4.      We are reborn as a life form somewhere else in the universe.

5.      We are reborn as a non-human life forms on Earth.

6.      We join with another consciousness and are reborn in some form or another.

7.      We move into another dimension that our living consciousness here on Earth cannot comprehend.

8.      We ascend to the paradise described in traditional views of heaven. Never to be reborn again.

9.      We are reborn in another world but keep our knowledge gained from the previous life.

10   We (or at least some of us) become 'angels' or messengers. Building new worlds across the universe that will themselves be populated by life

Scientific materialism would suggest the first option.  I am personally hoping for the singularity.

Monday, April 21, 2025

Thoughts on History

A deference to credentialism is never a viable approach to reinforce one's argument. Nevertheless this still doesn't imply that all opinions are equally valid. They simply are not. When analyzing an event and its repercussions a theoretical interpretation must still ride on the evidence presented and the plausibility of the thinking advanced to buttress it. Primary sources count more than their secondary sources. They are less clouded by a degree of removal from the event.

While originality of thought and dissenting view should be welcomed the originality counts for nothing if it fails to adhere to the factual constraints. There is no substitution for a thoroughness of investigation. The problem with many amateurs dabbling in history is that they often fail to recognize these truisms.

 

Saturday, June 8, 2024

Can Science explain everything?

 The various versions of the scientific method are the best tools that we have in understanding how the material world works. In its ideal practice it combines rational thought with the necessity of acquiring empirical evidence. This underpins a self corrective methodology that is evidence driven.

Since we are part of the material world its utility in helping us navigate the challenges of our world provides for explanations that are beneficial and pragmatic on a go forward basis.

The second question has more to do with the level of uncertainty we as individuals are willing to live with. This varies subjectively.

Friday, September 2, 2022

How Democracy dies...

 Signs of the emerging totalitarian state.

1. Fusion of the media and the party elite
2. Takeover of supposedly non-Partisan Institutions
3. De-platforming of alternative views
4. War against critical thought
5. Corruption of the Science
6. Growth of the surveillance state
7. Replacement of the family by the State
8. Narrative set as truth
9. Transformation of the language to suit new goals.
10. Over-zealous use of security as an excuse for state intrusion. Action to avert false flag insurrections.
11. Projection of totalitarian desires onto opponents
12. Deliberate weakening of the education system in the name of nebulous goals of betterment. Ideological manipulation of the curriculum.
13. Emphasis on Equality of Outcome over Opportunity.
14. Disregard for human life.
15. Forced stratification of class
16. Increasing double standards
17. Binary division – With me or against me?
18. Constant culture of pathogenic fear
19. Forced dependence economically on the state
20. Attacks on the independent Judiciary
21. Promotion of cultural apathy.
22. Purging of the military brass.
23. Inverted moralism
24. Interference in the personal banking system.
25. More bread and circuses for the populace.

Monday, July 4, 2022

Has the Frankfurt School destroyed society?

Not yet but in the absence of a push back it will. It has contributed to a significant decline already.

Cultural Marxism itself has its origins in the Frankfurt School (place of birth Frankfurt, Germany 1929) whose idealism incorporated a synthesis of Freudian, Marxist and Hegelian reasoning. It views history as march to an inevitability that can be directed by the control of institutions to facilitate necessary social change. In this way it deviates from Orthodox Marxism whose focus is largely on the economic.

Key thinkers here include Marcuse, Adorno, Horkheimer, Habermas and Fromm. Social Emancipation and critiques of capitalism dominate the discourse and its impact across Academia (in particular the social sciences and humanities) cannot be understated. From here it has spread influencing both the biological and physical sciences, the professions and education. All of the disciplines (indeed all facets of life) are viewed as a platform that can be used to advance the necessary social change favored by the ideologues.

In the United States and other parts of the Anglosphere , this fusion of cultural Marxism and post-modernism has worked its way from the university into the mainstream. The intent is to bring in trans formative change consistent with a re-calibration will to power and by all accounts it appears to be gaining the upper hand. Push back began during the Trump era but the failure of conservative elements to seize the initiative earlier on means that the necessary resistance is playing catch up. The power dynamic has shifted to favor these authoritarian leftist ideologues and all strata of society will be the worse off for it.

Cultural Marxism envisions a restructure society in a way that opposes the capitalist infrastructure in support of a top down rearrangement that will advance outcomes that are believed to be more equitable. Critical Race Theory, the dichotomy of the oppressed and the oppressor and a general hostility to the Judeo-Christian core of Western Civilization are vital aspects of its praxis. The mode of thinking is a definite outgrowth of a metastasized leftism but unlike the radicalism of the Bolsheviks, and various State socialisms it has settled for a patience that was willing to bide its time with a slower walk through the institutions.

This walk though has picked up having fueled a ride on the globalist bandwagon that has oxygenated its outreach. It has found a necessary ally in post-Modernism deconstructionist thought, which also abhors legacy structures and tradition.

As it stands today I have very little doubt whatsoever that the West is in decline. The institutions are showing all the rot of ideological take over with identity politics dominating over merit based philosophies. The corporate, governmental, academic and educational worlds have all been infected by the mind virus of guilt ridden wokeism with the subsequent fall in standards making its presence felt ubiquitously.

But like all tunnel-visioned marches that eschew self-criticism it will forge a landscape of collateral damage. Truth will be its first victim followed only slightly by its inability to entertain contrarian initiated free speech. In this it echoes a Maoist zeal that will torch history to rewrite a narrative. Nothing is sacred, definitions are fleeting and victimhood serves as a weapon to justify what is needed. At its core it knows no constraints and if not checked will furnish a body count of lost lives and torched careers that for expedience of power will leave the gains of the enlightenment burning in a smoldering heap


Sunday, February 27, 2022

A realization

One aspect that I have learnt over the years is that their are various perspectives to an issue. That being said this does not imply that all perspectives are equally valid. To understand the latter one has to delve into the details which many are loathe to do. There is an innate fear of having one's confirmation bias shattere

Sunday, October 31, 2021

Why do politicians embrace anti-intellectualism and do these same politicians regret their actions?

Asked on Quora. My answer.

I am not sure what is meant by the phrase anti-intellectualism anymore. The term has been so abused that it appears to have lost meaning. If you are referring to an opposition against various avenues of intellectual/elitist idealism than the reasons are obvious.

All too often these ideals lack empirical support and prejudice the ‘ought’ over the ‘is’. Many are formulated on assumptions that fall short when tested in reality. However they have the potential to cause great harm at the local level by their zealous drive in removing necessary structures that have working utility.

Opposition is usually a function of resisting the tendency to fix what is not broken. As for the signs of regret..that is a consequence of the individual dynamic. Who knows what goes through a person’s mind? People have different motivations.

Science v Scientism

 Pure Science itself isn’t inherently an ideology. It a method of examining claims through empirical investigation and then drawing conclusion that have predictive value. It uses the framework of mathematics and statistics to analyze the evidence thereby opening up further avenues of investigation to test deeper claims. In this regard it has been very successful.

Having said that though Paul Feyerabend has a point when the practitioners of science become dogmatic and political in their outlook to the point that they transform the practice of science into a milieu dominated by groupthink, the willful neglect of contrary evidence and the elevation of the power dynamic of credentialism.

This invariably results in stagnant thinking, the formation of a closed secretarian priesthood/authority and the sacrifice of the rigorous scientific methodology to preordained conclusions.

The further venture of science into realms which are less quantifiable or indeed falsifiable (eg. morality and metaphysics) further challenges the scope of science’s applicability. A realism that seems lost to those who with each passing moment are intent in transforming science into the ideology of scientism.

Wednesday, August 26, 2020

What could Stephen Hawking. Albert Einstein and Isaac Newton achieve in a laboratory?

(Paraphrase of a Question asked on Quora). Once again my answer.

Hawking and Einstein were theoretical physicists so as much as they may no doubt value the importance of lab work it was not their avenue of strength nor was it the forum whereby they demonstrated their genius. Their minds were the laboratories. Not so for SIN who excelled at both the experimental and theoretical aspects of physics (remember his work with Light Dispersion).
In his case the world would be his oyster, the only limitation being the equipment and technology available at the time. The one knock though against Newton is that he had a tendency to not play well with others. In a framework where co-operation is key this would work against him

Friday, August 14, 2020

Why is Russian literature so great?

I have a strong interest in Russian history....so I took a stab at it. Answer was short. Consistent with attention span on Quora.

A long and persistent history of suffering.
Russia has an incredibly rich national story that is replete with famines, land based slavery (serfdom). power abuse by strongmen, miserable winters, peasant revolts, dangerous misuse of social engineering, civil wars, foreign invasions, purges, Gulags and a chronic suppression of minority rights. Dull moments are rare.
Painful as this it provides for a narrative backdrop that is incredibly rich and serves as a conduit through which the struggles that define the human condition can be played out.
All of the Great Russian writers - Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, Pushkin, Gorky, Chekov and Solzhenitsyn - have taken advantage of this historical tapestry to truly and authentically delve into the nature of what it is to be a person.

Friday, July 5, 2019

At election time do you prefer to hear policies or rhetoric from politicians?

My answer on Quora.

The problem here is that in election time it is difficult to distinguish the two. Politicians put forward policies that are high on rhetoric and short on practicality. This of course is deliberate as nobody wants to be placed on the defensive at election time. It is far easier to defend ‘pies in the sky’ than to descend into the trenches to outline the workables.
Besides it is rhetoric that brings out the base. ‘Medicare for All’ rings well for some. Outlining how you intend to pay for it. Not so much. It is no wonder that Bernie Sanders ran from this question in the last debate while slipping on the Walter Mondale banana skin of ‘tax increases.’
Donald Trump saw the value of rhetoric with his ‘Make American Great Again’ so did Barack Obama and his mantra of ‘Change’. Both were high on voice bytes but lacking in specifics. It is for this reason that listening to campaign speeches is largely a waste of time. Debates are only one step better (although you wouldn’t think so with Round I and II of the recent Democratic free-for-all). The best you can get, if you value informed policy, would be a one-on-one interview with no soft ball questions. They are rare for a reason.
Elections are popularity contests not moments of intellectual swagger. They are the domain of the marketer not the technician. Brand is all that matters with complications around policy relegated to the realm of the after thought,lest they detract from the end goal of victory.
This is the tragedy of the election. It exists everywhere. The trouble with American politics in particular is that the nature of the system has set up a continuous election cycle with virtually no break from recourse to the partisan denominator.

Tuesday, June 11, 2019

Is Liverpool the most successful English team?

My answer on Quora.
This is definitely a two horse race. Liverpool v Manchester United. I am calling it a tie. Let us look into this.
Point to consider - I am a die-hard Liverpool fan. However I will try to be as objective in this particular analysis as possible.
League Titles - Manchester United has 20 titles compared to Liverpool’s 18. Arsenal are third with 13. United have also been runners-up 16 times compared to Liverpool’s 14. Advantage: Manchester United.
FA Cups - Arsenal with 13 titles are the most successful English team in this competition. Manchester United have 12 titles. Liverpool were late starters to the FA Cup (winning their first title here in 1965) but have a total of 7 titles to their name. Spurs and Chelsea both have eight. Arsenal and United have been runners-up seven and eight times respectively while Liverpool have lost seven finals. Advantage: Manchester United.
League Cups - Liverpool dominate here with eight titles and four runners-up spots. Included in this is four League Cup wins in a row (1981–84). United have won the League Cup five times and have lost four finals. Manchester City has six league cups to their name, placing them in second position. Advantage: Liverpool
European Champions League (formerly European Cup) - Liverpool has won Europe’s Premier tournament six times placing them third overall behind Real Madrid (13) and AC Milan (7). Liverpool also won back-to-back titles in 1977 and 1978. Manchester United have three Champion’s Leagues to their name with Nottingham Forest ranking third with two titles( for English clubs in this category). In terms of final runners-up Liverpool have earned this accolade three times compared to United’s twice. Advantage: Liverpool
Manchester United during happier times Source: Mail online.
UEFA Cup/Europa League - Liverpool have won the UEFA Cup (now the Europa League) three times making them the most successful English team in this competition as well. They have been runners-up once. In terms of trophy haul here they are tied in second place with Inter Milan, Juventus and Atletico Madrid. Seville of Spain leads this category with five titles. Chelsea and Tottenham have each won two titles while United has one. Advantage: Liverpool
European Cup Winners Cup - This tournament was originally contested by the winners of the various Domestic cup competitions. It is now defunct. Barcelona won the cup a record four times. Chelsea were the most successful English team with two titles. Manchester United won it once. Liverpool were unsuccessful here although they were a runner-up once in the 60s. Advantage: Manchester United
World Club Championship/intercontinental Cup- This was at one time a one-off game between the winners of the European Cup and South America’s Copa Libertadores (usually played in Tokyo). It evolved into a mini round-robin with other regional champions at one point (which very few people liked) and is on the verge of becoming an even larger tournament (which even more people are unhappy with). Credit United with two wins (one under the banner of the Intercontinental Cup). Liverpool are without a win. Advantage: Manchester United.
UEFA Super Cup - This is a single game (played in Monaco) between the winners of the Champions League and the Europa Cup (in earlier times it was the Cup-Winners Cup). Liverpool have won it three times compared to United’s once. Advantage: Liverpool
Community/Charity Shield - This match serves as the curtain raiser to the new season and features the winner of the League against the FA Cup champion from the previous season. Manchester United have won the shield 21 compared to Liverpool’s 15 (they are tied for second spot with Arsenal). Advantage: Manchester United
In the final analysis I will not include lower division titles. United have two old second division titles. Liverpool have four plus a Lancashire League.
Awarding Points according to the following system. Champions League - 8, League - 6, UEFA Cup/Europa League/Cup Winners Cup - 5, FA Cup - 4, League Cup -3, All other competitions - 1.
Remember not all silverware is equivalent.
The final result is…..
Liverpool - 241 Points. Manchester United - 241 Points.
A Tie and believe me I didn’t rig this one.
For comparison I calculated the score values for the other teams in the Big Six. They are Arsenal (146), Chelsea (117), Man City (83) and Tottenham Hotspurs (71).
Here are some tie breakers for the top two.
League/FA Cup Doubles - United 3 Liverpool 1
League/League Cup Doubles - Liverpool 3 (all in a row) United 1
League/European Cup - Liverpool 2 United 2
League/UEFA Cup - Liverpool 2 United 0
Trebles (not including one-off competition matches) - Liverpool 2 (1984, 2001) United 1 (1999)
So take your pick or flip a coin.
For those who want to go deeper there is always this. Premier League + 1. Division - All-time league table. Liverpool come out on top.

Saturday, February 9, 2019

An Alternative History of the Future - Entry XVI

2078
Sino-Russia alliance
Russian dictator Yuri Sporzakov met with Chinese premier Zing Zeching in Hong Kong. The two leaders put aside their differences and decided to implement a cooperative economic and military plan. Analysts later argued that Sporzakov and Zeching had decided to divide up their territorial ambitions, so that Russia would be granted free reign in Europe and parts of the Middle East, while China would pursue its imperialistic aims in Asia without hindrance. At the meeting’s conclusion, Sporzakov remarked, “There is a need to create a new global power base, independent of the constraints of liberal democracy.” Such a power base, Sporzakov claimed, would favour the economic and population settlement demands of the “oppressed” Slavic and Chinese people. For several years, Sporzakov had spoken against what he termed “the economic exploitation of the Slavic people by Western nations.”
The EU and USA responded to the Sino-Russian bilateral agreement, by drawing several nations of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) Pact, all of whom feared Chinese expansion, into military alliance with the West.

Assessment of global distribution of military power
The Relative Military rankings of the principal international armed forces, as listed in a 2078 edition of Jane’s, is given below.
The unit of measurement is the Military Standard (MS).
1 MS is equivalent to
2 battleships or
50 tanks or
1 aircraft carrier or
15 conventional missiles or
4 cruiser ships or
1 killer satellite or
10 fighter bombers

Country or Alliance

MS Units

Slavo-Asian Alliance

245

USA

237

China

212

EU

195

ASEAN[5]

174

WAU

94

LAAF[6]

95

EAF

62


The development of anti-nuclear missile systems by the major powers between 2020 and 2065, meant conventional wars could be waged without fear of recourse to nuclear weapons.
2079
The gathering storm between the West and Sino-Russia
Through a unanimous vote in Accra, the WAU opted to remain neutral with respect to the continued hostility unfolding between the Sino-Russian camp and the EU-US alliance. Latin American countries split evenly over the decision to choose sides in a conflict that one Brazilian political analyst described as a “Northern Hemisphere Crisis.” The Middle Eastern and Maghreb countries also expressed mixed feelings, with Algeria, Iraq and Pakistan siding diplomatically with the Sino-Russians, while Egypt’s secular government, Israel and Syria-Jordan backed the EU-US alliance. The EAF opted to remain neutral in any conflict.

Space agency splits: Two new space cities open
A political struggle within the SPA, led to the splitting of the organization and the formation of the rival International Space Agency (ISA), of which the United States and Germany were leading founders.
The same year, two space cities, Futaria A and Mirov, were established. The former was situated near the asteroid belt, where it functioned as a scientific monitoring base. The latter, an agricultural project belonging to the powerful Russian corporation Vlatchkov Holdings, was located in the vicinity of Venus.

Invention of the Gravo-suit
Denis Champlain, a Quebec engineer, invented the high-tech gravo-suit, that proved vital in the exploration of the outer planets in the 2090s. The suit used micro-stabo generators, implanted in its material fibre, to normalize the gravitational forces exerted upon an individual. The new suits were more comfortable than earlier technologies weighed less and offered better protection against cosmic radiation.

2080
Breakthrough in molecular genetic cleaning
General Electric designed and built the first Deletrious Molecular Remover (DMR). The DMR used controlled X-ray bombardment to clean DNA strands at the nanotech level. DMR was further enhanced in 2090s, by the development of DNA reconfiguration devices, able to remove unwanted atomic interference in individual DNA bases and thereby stabilize the integrity of the molecule against potential decay. Computer enhancement later increased the speed of DNA cleaning in vivo, thereby insuring the viable reproduction of DNA in the body. It became commonplace in the early twenty-second century, for people to visit DNA clinics to have their DNA cleaned as a protection against cancer.

War in Europe edges closer
A joint session of the UN and WON was convened in Lima, Peru, after the Russians began massing troops on the Polish and Finnish borders. UN Secretary-General Dominique Lamberaine, invited the Russians to discuss the troop deployment with representatives of the EU. This meeting, held in Geneva, proved fruitless. Russian Foreign Minister Ivan Balchenko, argued that Moscow was supporting the interests of Slavic minorities in both Poland and Finland and would not retreat from its planned action. The world held its breath as the threat of war became more imminent.

Mass space transport
As the dense population of the planet continued to strain Earth’s resources and decrease many people’s quality of life, cash benefits paid by interplanetary development corporations further enticed would-be new world colonists.
Simultaneously, the Technological Resource Foundation, ASEAN’s Engineering Initiative and a consortium of aeronautical companies (Airstar International, Lugvlieg Inc., Tatse-Yakamoto and Airbus), unveiled the Da Vinci series of high-capacity spaceships for both commercial and military use. These ships transported large numbers of people (up to eight thousand at a time), at high velocities, to destinations including Mars and Jupiter, furthering the space colonization initiative.

2081
China flexes her muscle
In August, China launched an attack on the independent nation of Nepal. Despite a brave defense by elite Ghurka fighting units, Katmandu fell to Chinese forces two months after the invasion. The UN and WON condemned the Chinese action by placing international trade sanctions on Beijing, however, countries in the Slavo-Asian Pact refused to adhere to these sanctions. In September, Chinese naval destroyers clashed with Japanese battleships off the Korean coast.

The West’s guarantees
The EU and US issued the Brussels Promise, guaranteeing the sovereign rights of any country threatened by either Slavo-Asian or Chinese aggression. US president Dianne Bergholm, despite her election less than a year earlier on an anti-war platform, won approval from Congress to introduce compulsory military conscription.

2082
Ukraine joins forces with Russia
Anatol Fuchma, a general in the Ukrainian Armed Forces, took control of the government in Kiev, after staging a successful military coup d’état. Fuchma added his country’s name to the Slavo-Asian pact, in spite of Western efforts to keep the Ukraine outside Russia’s sphere of influence. He preached Slavic brotherhood and coexistence, similar to Sporzakov’s rhetoric.
Soon after Fuchma gained control, construction began on an underground tunnel to enable the shipment of supplies between the Ukraine and Russia.


Saturday, November 17, 2018

An Alternative History of the Future - Entry XV

2075-2100: The Buildup, Outbreak and Resolution of the Third World War
Russia resurrects military alliance; Arms race renews
Leaders of eleven[1] of the fifteen ex-Soviet republics met in Minsk. Under the guidance of Russian dictator Yuri Sporzakov, a military alliance was struck and the economic principles of the NEB were reaffirmed. Sporzakov delivered an emotionally charged speech, exhorting the Slavic and Asian peoples to rise again to global power, at the expense of Western nations.
The Slavo-Asian Pact and Sporzakov’s rhetoric, produced widespread unease in the West. Anticipating direct military confrontation between the Pact/NEB countries and Western nations, the EU and the USA began a military buildup.

2076
First brain transplant
The first viable brain transplant was performed in 2076, by the Italian neurosurgeon Vincent Feurri. The recipient of the donor brain lived for fourteen hours. Feurri’s work relied on flash freezing and selective heating techniques, pioneered by Eden Base medical clinics in the 2060s. Neurosurgeons Lo Win and Miero Kamarika continued Feurri’s work, rewiring nerves by computer. By the late 2090s, brain transplant recipients commonly lived for ten years or more.

2077
Artificial intelligence popularized
Peocomp,[2] a fifth-generation personal artificial intelligence unit, became a marketing success. Each Peocomp was custom-made to its owner’s requirements to provide instruction, organize household affairs or be a companion. Logo Brain, the Texas-based company responsible for developing artificial intelligence technology, was credited with this first use of artificial intelligence for the general public.

Moldavia joins Slavo-Asian pact; USA offers support to EU
Russia successfully incorporated Moldavia into the Slavo-Asian Pact in 2077. Fearful of Russia’s increasing belligerence, American President Jeffery Smyth, offered the EU the use of two hundred F-46 fighter aircraft and sixty B-88 bombers.

Emergence of the science of brain tectonics
The science of brain tectonics was born at the Piaget Centre for Neurological Study in Toronto, Canada. Brain tectonics studied the brain’s action, by directly monitoring the movement of the brain’s so-called neuron plates, first discovered in 2063. The investigation of this motion was instrumental in understanding such conditions as epilepsy, mania, pylam[3] and mectian.[4]

Saturday, October 27, 2018

Why I write....

This piece, that I wrote in 1998, sums up why I have written speculative fiction...such as my book A History of the Future (2025-2525).

There is much to fear in the world of Existentialism where the dread of oneness to a nothing stands as testament. To escape such baroness of indescribable angst I choose to retreat to a world of my own making. A castle of my ideas where the fractals of mind crystallize into a uniformity creating gateways to 'playthink'….the heaven of my imagination.

It is here that I am a master. A contented deity toying with elements, envisioning scenarios and building story book tales that span the infinity of time.

I live in a peace-like-vapour summoning the greats of history to live in a fantasy with ideas that cry of my making. I am free unbounded by restrictions accosted only by particles that I have exorcised from the demon of idleness to make use in a mechanism of my conception.

The energy that I receive defies physics, crashing limits as it grabs the soul opening up a zest that rekindles a love for my own being.

No longer do I quiver in a dormancy cowered as a prisoner of self doubt. I now can write. An artery linking thought to pen is fused, transporting the sustenance of the pure brain-plan to the reality of the structured form. I am sculpting, developing, churning furrows as I lance continuously into the rich streams of make-believe

Wednesday, October 24, 2018

God's diary....

Just for fun I imagine that this could be the entry for Days 5 and 8 that make nobody happy....

The Andromeda galaxy was to contain planets of rare beauty. This was my experimental galaxy, it was hearing that I introduced such features as oscillating mountain range, vertical seas, mesomorphic caves and organic quick sand pits. But don’t worry the Milky Way and even the Earth based solar system was blessed with its own idiosyncrasies.
All this design and building work happened on Day 5. I could move faster than the angels but I did require some of their help in making sure that the more routine planets such as mercury were correctly designed. They also assisted me in the architectural manipulation of many of the planetary moon. I extended the length of Day 5 to make sure that all the design work was complete. Something that I could have done on others day, except for the fact that it tends to make the angels lazy as well as taking away the true joy of working under pressure. A concept, I feel, every angel assistant creator should experience. The customizing of the planets is my favorite part of the creation process even more so than the life form design which follows on Day 6 (Note: my days outlined in this autobiography and the days of the human bible differ slightly but the general just of the idea is the same). I am not sure why. Even God is sometimes perplexed by some questions, but I suppose it has something to do with its appeal to my artistic side.


Day 6, was the day of Life. I woke up early to get a head start on preparing the algorithm for the Evolutionary Generator. Carbon was chosen as the basic element for life, although I decided to add both silicon and Germanium life forms to the equation. Carbon with its four valences would be a better choice than Nitrogen which I had used in 857 or Fluoride which I chose for 852 (those Fluoride based insect life forms of 85 were extremely difficult to control and proved to be one of the influential factors leading me to vanquish this Universe). Some of you may ask whether I always stick to the same Periodic Table of Elements when designing the Universe? The answer of course is No. I have worked with over 400 types of Periodic Tables in my life as a creator. Version 357, that exists as the basis for 888 is therefore one of many, but it is also one of my favorites as the majority of elements tend to be stable.