There are two ways to answer this question. I will offer both. The first is what they should be used for (Positive) , the second is the arena that politicians driven by less than honorable have unfortunately taken science into (the Negative).
Positive Uses
- Informing decision on complex issues where many stakeholders are involved;
- Using it to drive policy that will likely improve the living conditions for many;
- debunking irrational thought;
- safeguarding the population against legitimate threats both external and internal.
Negative uses
- generating fear to promote a specific political agenda;
- misinterpreting it to shut down dissenting voices;
- overextending scientific conclusions into regions beyond its scope of interpretation;
- disregarding empirical evidence that contradicts the science;
- using it to snoop on people’s privacy for no immediate concern;
- minimizing the environmental impact of technology to oversell its economic utility;
- Using it as a weapon against certain segments of the population.
No comments:
Post a Comment