The common wisdom is that the liberal western democracy has
its roots in the democratic structure of Ancient Greece and to some extent that
is true. Athens was easily Greece’s most influential city, even if its prowess
as evident in the Peloponnesian War did not always translate to military
success. Yet the democracy of the Athenian’s was on a level far removed from
that what we see today in the west and had origins which were less than glorious.
Like most ancient cities Athens was ruled by a king who was
the head of the land-owning aristocrats (Eupatridae). A council of government
called the Areopagus was charged with the day-to-day running of the city that
expanded as Athens came to dominate the region of Attica in a process known as
synoikismos. However unrest caused by disparities in income undermined the
status quo and the Areopagus, through its go-to-guy Draco (whose name provides
the root for the draconian adjective) drafted stringent codified laws to
curtail these unwelcome developments. Predictably they failed and the Areopagus
was forced to carry out an ‘about face’ with the appointment of the reformer,
Solon (whose bas-relief can be found in the US House of Representatives).
Solon (aka the Lawgiver)
is credited with laying the foundations for the Athenian model of
democracy. He reduced the economic power of the aristocracy, lessened
restrictions on trade and commerce and restructured Athenian society into four
groupings. Wealth and military service were to guide such division but what was
most important is that the poorest of all these classes, the Thetai, were given
political rights for the first time.
True power still resided with the Areopagus and initially
class unrest was not curtailed. However the system would continue under the
tyrant (a name given to somebody who takes power by force) Peisistratus
(Solon’s cousin).
The true hero though of Athenian democracy was Cleisthenes,
who further weakened the power of the aristocracy and introduced a system of
ostracism (whereby citizens deemed to be a threat to the democracy could by a
vote of 6,000 citizens be exiled from the city for ten years).
Cleisthenes filled positions in his government using a
random selection process known as sortition (setting up the Council of 500). He
also transformed the four traditional tribes system of order into a system of
ten tribes based on area of residency. These new structures were known as
demes.
Despite the successes Athenian Democracy was a far cry from
the democracy we have today (although it was revolutionary in its break from
the political structures of its time). Only free, male citizens above the age
of 18 could vote with the exclusive citizenship criteria greatly restricting
the electorate base. Consequently at the height of its power it is believed
that only 10-20% of the population of 310,000 has any say whatsoever in the
running of the Athenian polis. Nevertheless it was an important start that
would pave the way for later reforms and therefore should be judged favourably
as a valuable milestone in the development of the western political structure.
No comments:
Post a Comment