Catherine the Great was a German-born Empress who ruled over Russia between 1762 and 1796. Her reign is associated with the further modernization of Russia on both a political and cultural level. At age 14 Catherine married the grand duke Peter (later Peter III), the grandson of Peter the Great. However her husband’s difficult nature, eccentric personality and infatuation with Frederick II of Prussia made him an unpopular figure in the court.
Catherine the Great source: historyextra.com
With the
backing of a lover Grigory Orlov (she would have several of these) and other nobles she was involved in a palace
coup that forced the abdication of Peter and his later assassination. Catherine would
then ascend to the throne in September 1762 almost twenty years after her ill-fated
marriage to Peter.
Catherine II (or Ekaterina II) was somewhat of an idealist as a rule who longed to create a fairer justice
system in Russia and a court that would rival that of the French Versailles.
She was extremely motivated in her ambition but had to be careful of her
position in the country in light of the fact that she had taken the throne in so dubious a manner.
Property
was seized from the clergy to replenish the state coffers (that were weakened
as a result of the Seven Years War). She
improved relations with Prussia and solidified her alliance with France and
Austria. A puppet government loyal to Russia was installed in Poland. However
she struggled to reform the constitution and was met by a resilient push back from the old
orders.
In 1768 Russia went to war against Turkey and two years later secured a victory at the battle of Çeşme, which they unfortunately failed to transform into immediate political gains. However the situation would be rectified when the conflict ended in 1774, with Russia gaining a stronger foothold in the Black sea as a result of the Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca.
In 1773 a
plague broke out in Russia and events were further complicated by a rebellion
led by the Don Cossack, Yemeylan Pugachev. The rebels marched on Moscow before their aspirations were put down by elite troops loyal to Catherine. Pugachev was beheaded but
he left behind him regions that had been reduced to turmoil by the chaos.
Catherine tried to emancipate the Russian serfs
bur resistance from the aristocrats forced her to make an about face. She then
strengthened the idea of serfdom further extending it into the Ukraine. This
policy was the antithesis of the enlightened monarch ideal that she served to
cultivate at her royal court (where she seemed sympathetic to the ideals of Montesquieu
and Rousseau)
From 1774 onward Grigory Potemkin played an
important role in her court, He was an accomplished military figure, minor
noble and above all else her lover. Potemkin would serve politically as a chief
minister to her where he advocated for territorial expansion and helped further the splendour associated
with Catherine's reign. In 1783 Russia annexed the Crimea, a move that would threaten the Ottoman Empire and strain relations with both Prussia and
England.
At home Catherine encouraged a certain degree of free thought but paradoxically clamped down on dissent or criticism of her rule. Poland, which had been dominated by Russia agitated for a Liberal constitution and were led in this regard by Tadeusz Kościuszko, a Polish nationalist who had fought in the American Revolution. His 1794 revolution was thwarted by Catherine who used a partition plan in 1795 to divide Poland between Russia, Prussia and Austria thus effectively removing the country from the map.
1795 Marked the Third Time that Poland was partitioned in the 18th century.
Source: europecentenary.eu (Other partitions were in 1772 and 1793)
In 1796
Catherine passed away. She was succeeded by her son Paul I who early life had
been very much overshadowed by his mother.
Paul I (1796-1801) source: unofficialroyalty.com
So how was Catherine as a monarch?
Well she certainly strengthened Russia’s hand at
the expense of Poland, Turkey and the Ukraine. Her court demonstrated a facade
that appeared to be forward thinking but in many respects she was just more
of an enlightened despot than a true reformer.
When she had leverage she would appear to take on the nobility but all
too often defaulted and extended the regressive framework of serfdom. Her personal life was straddled with
ex-lovers and although she had an incredible intelligence and curiosity she at
times demonstrated a poor judge of character. Nevertheless she left Russia in a
stronger position than that which she inherited so that the nation had the
foundation to play a vital role in the forthcoming Napoleonic wars.
No comments:
Post a Comment