Friday, October 12, 2018

Napoleon's Egyptian Campaign...Key Timeline events


Campaign was motivated by two reasons - An increase in France's trade profile and a way of checking British interests in India. Napoleon brought both soldiers and scholars to this campaign as he saw it as a Scientific expedition as well. The following is a summary of the key events

1798 - French expedition leaves Toulon on the 19th of May. Despite some tough resistance captures Malta which France will hold until 1800.

1798 - Arrives in Alexandia on July 1st. Defeats Mamluk forces at the Battle of the Pyramids on July 21st. French Naval fleet destroyed by Horatio Nelson'sBritish fleet at the Battle of the Nile (aka Battle of Aboukir Bay) between August 1-3rd. French army is landlocked.

1798 - French administration in Egypt. Period of Scientific/cultural exchange. Egyptology gains prominence. Discovery of the Rossetta Stone in July 1799. Printing press introduced to Egypt. Revolt against Napoleonic rule in Cairo. French will retake the City.

1799 - French expansion into Palestine - victories at Jaffa, Nazareth, Cana, , Mount Tabor. French suffer setback at the Siege of Acre against British-Ottoman Alliance. Retreat from Acre. Wins the Battle of Abukir.

1799 - Napoleon returns to France (takes advantage of temporary leave of British fleet) after learning that the French campaign in Italy has been faltering. Jean-Baptiste Kléber commands French forces in Middle East. Kléber enjoys some military success but is assassinated  in 1800.

1800 - 1801 - British and Ottoman forces recapture territory won by the French.French suffer a defeat at the Battle of Alexandria. French general Augustin Daniel Belliard surrenders to the British at Cairo  on 22nd June 1801.

Special Relativity and General Relativity in a nutshell

I was asked to sum this up as succinctly as possible....

Special relativity - The laws of physics holds true across all frames of reference (FORs) which means that the speed of light in a vacuum (c) is the same for all observers. As a consequence of this reality we are forced to forego the notion of absolute space and time. These constructs will be measured differently by observers based on their specific reference frames making both time and space relative quantities. Additional relativistic effects impact Momentum and the simultaneity of events as viewed from different FORs. Special relativity is a ‘special’ case in that it assumes that all frames of references are themselves not accelerating.
General relativity -Extends Special Relativity into realm of the accelerating FOR and makes the case for gravity being a geometric property of the spacetime background (think of this as the mattress of the universe). Objects with more mass distort spacetime to a greater degree than less massive objects creating more bumps and lumps that influence other objects around them. This manifests itself as the gravity (weight) phenomenon in the classic world.


Monday, October 8, 2018

Some of my Quora answers

What do world class physicists "get" that the typical physicist does not?



In the words of Dr. Albert Szent-Gyorgyi, Nobel Prize winner: Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and think what nobody has thought
Great physicists excel with the latter.

If MLK wasn’t killed how would our world be?


The death of MLK was a national tragedy. MLK spoke about the sanctity of the individual and I believe that had he survived he would have continued advancing this key message. The US would be the better for it. Unfortunately since his death, several political opportunists have distorted this critical stance in favour of Group Identity politics to advance narratives that have poisoned instead of healed the race divide across the country.


Have liberals compromised too much on their core values, whatever they may be?


Yes they have. I consider myself a Classical Liberal and believe that the biggest compromise has occurred in the area of individual rights. As a function of political expediency, all too often these have been surrendered in the face of Rousseau’s Will to Power which frames the malignant politics of group identity.


Do you think that all American institutions, not just politics, have become radicalized and divisive?


Unfortunately they are. The biggest problem is that the constructs of race and sex have been used to drive forward the will to power for a partisan elite. Group Identity as a tool matters more in this toxic mix than the ultimate sovereignty of the individual.

Sunday, September 30, 2018

Which civilization was the equivalent of America in the ancient world?

Very interesting question. There are several levels at which this can be analyzed.

The United States today is a large, pluralistic society and a constitutional republic. It has a separation of powers, with many institutions operating along democratic lines at the local, state, and federal levels. Its value system can be understood as a fusion of Greek rationalism, Scottish Enlightenment empiricism, and Judeo-Christian ethics. Economically, the United States operates primarily through free-market systems, tempered by various public-sector institutions and government regulations.

When these attributes are considered together, they make the United States a rather unique and continuing experiment in the history of our species.

Having said that, it is still worthwhile drawing comparisons, particularly in the realms of international influence, the exercise of power, and cultural reach. With this in mind, I would argue that four ancient civilizations bear some comparison with the United States.

a. Ancient Egypt

Ancient Egypt dominated much of North Africa and exerted considerable influence over the politics of the Levant, particularly during various periods of the second millennium and early first millennium BC. Together with Mesopotamia, Egypt can be regarded as one of the primordial drivers of the civilizations that ultimately contributed to what we now call the Western tradition.

b. Ancient Greece

The Greek city-state model, existing within a broader Hellenic civilization, offers a loose analogy with the state-federal model that defines the United States. I agree that the analogy has significant limitations: the Greek poleis were highly decentralized and often fiercely independent, and there was nothing resembling the modern American federal government until the Hellenistic period brought much greater political consolidation under Macedonian rule.

Nevertheless, Greek civilization exercised an enormous influence across the Mediterranean and provided a major intellectual and cultural counterweight to the civilizations of the East. Its achievements in philosophy, science, political thought, art, literature, and architecture continued to resonate long after the political independence of the individual city-states had declined. In terms of intellectual accomplishment and cultural reach, there are certainly parallels with the United States.

c. Ancient Rome

The Roman Republic provides perhaps the most obvious political comparison with the United States. Its republican institutions, separation of political powers, elected magistrates, representative bodies, and tradition of civic virtue exerted a profound influence on the American Founding Fathers. This is, of course, no coincidence.

The later Roman Empire was fundamentally different from the American constitutional system, but Rome's ability to project military, political, economic, and cultural power across an enormous geographic area made it the great superpower of its age. At the height of its power, Rome was largely unrivaled militarily within the Mediterranean world and exercised enormous influence over the economic and political structures of the territories under its control.

d. The Achaemenid Persian Empire

Before the rise of Macedon and the Hellenistic world, the Achaemenid Persian Empire was the dominant power across much of the Near East and the largest empire the ancient world had yet seen. It is particularly interesting as a comparison because of its ability to govern an extraordinarily diverse population while generally allowing considerable latitude in local customs, religions, and traditions.

Persia incorporated an enormous variety of peoples and belief systems into a common imperial framework. Although this tolerance had practical political limits and should not be confused with modern liberal pluralism, the Persian approach to governing diversity provides an interesting point of comparison with the multicultural character of the modern United States.

Even after considering all four of these civilizations—and putting aside obvious distinctions such as monarchy, dynastic rule, slavery, and various forms of autocratic government—I would argue that the United States remains distinct.

Unlike these ancient powers, the American Republic has not been primarily defined by a continuous need to expand and maintain an imperial territorial system beyond its core nation-state. There have certainly been periods of American imperialism, territorial expansion, intervention, and occupation, and these should not be minimized. The United States has exercised enormous power abroad and has at times pursued policies that can reasonably be described as imperialistic.

Yet there is an important distinction in the long-term structure of American power. The United States has generally been reluctant to maintain a traditional empire based upon the permanent occupation and direct administration of foreign territories. Its historical tendency, particularly after the Second World War, has been toward the creation of alliances, spheres of influence, economic relationships, military partnerships, and international institutions rather than the formal annexation and permanent administration of large overseas territories.

This is an important distinction from the great imperial civilizations of antiquity. Egypt, Persia, Greece in its Hellenistic form, and especially Rome expanded through the conquest and incorporation of territories and peoples into political structures ultimately controlled by the imperial center.

The United States, by contrast, has exercised much of its global influence without creating a conventional territorial empire on the Roman model. Its power has rested not only upon military strength but also upon economic influence, technological innovation, cultural reach, institutional alliances, and the attraction of its political and economic model.

That does not make the United States an entirely non-imperial power. Rather, it makes the form of American power historically unusual. It is a republic that became a global superpower without fully transforming itself into a conventional empire.

That distinction, in my view, is essential when comparing the United States with the great civilizations of antiquity.


More Tales from the World of Physics Education

As a Physics teacher I never feel truly comfortable that I have figured it all out and that (for want of better words) is a good thing. If I did I would be tempted to sit back and relax which may have its benefits in the short run but from a growth perspective offers dubious value in the long term.
Over the course of the last week I have been working with my Grade Twelves on Special Relativity - a notorious pitfall for conceptual errors. I have taught (not to mention learned and re-learned) the sub-unit over twenty times in my career and I still find oddities that compel me to rethink my understanding of what is arguably one of the most counter-intuitive areas in all of Physics (notwithstanding Quantum Mechanics of course).
You see Special Relativity takes so much of what we formalize in classical physics and turns it on its head. Absolute space - gone, Absolute time - dead, Absolute momentum - see you later, Kinetic Energy - we need a rethink. To top this off we teach the topic in a week (due to time constraints - I will avoid the pun) and tantalize the students with such notions as the Twin Paradox and the notion that events that are simultaneous in one frame of reference need not be in another.
Serious stuff - but the kids love it and boy do they challenge me with a series of 'What happens ifs..?' .This in turn makes me hit the books/internet for solutions which in turn improves my own understanding. A wonderful positive feedback loop if ever there was one and for this I am thankful

Saturday, September 22, 2018

What makes Empires crumble?

Answered on Quora

As someone who reads a great deal of history across all fields I have identified several reasons. Narrowing it done to one factor usually oversimplifies the issue. Here they are in my opinion
  • Economic mismanagement and devaluation of the currency - the Empire’s chief currency loses buying power over time eg. Western Roman Empire;
  • Poor leadership - A persistent chain of corrupt, weak and ineffective leadership eg. the Ottoman and Western Roman Empires;
  • The Rise of an outsider power that is more aggressive eg. The Arabs taking down the Byzantine Empire;
  • A series of catastrophic wars that saps the will to rule of the Empire’s elite eg. British Empire post WWI and WWII;
  • Greatly increased Cost of administration - eg. The European Colonial Empires in the latter part of the 20th century;
  • Over extension of power leading to blow back eg. Rome following Trajan;
  • Leadership struggles eg. Mongol Empire post Genghis Khan or Alexander the Great’s Empire following his death;
  • Failure to innovate and maintain a high level of technological progress eg. Ottoman Empire from the 18th century onward;
  • Growth of Nationalism and Liberalism in conquered territory eg. South American uprisings against Spain the 19th century;
  • Radical climate change leading to famine or drought eg. thought to be the main cause of the fall of the Mayan Empire;
  • Civil War eg. Struggles between power groups within an Empire eg. Various Chinese Dynasty battles;
  • Defeat by a coalition of forces eg. Japan during WWII or Napoleon’s Empire;
  • Revolutionary change eg. Portugal following the Flower Revolution;
  • Disease and Demographic disturbance eg. Impact on the Aztecs and Incas as a a result of the Spanish influence;
  • Loyalty to the center core disappears with time eg. Austro-Hungarian Empire;
  • Rise of ideology that undermines the core value system of the Empire - eg. Communism in the Tsarist Empire or as some would argue Christianity in Rome.

Monday, September 17, 2018

In Praise of Me-Time

One of the discoveries of growing older is the realization that time itself is extremely valuable. When one was younger, time seemed as plentiful as the atmosphere. It was there it was available and it seemed to last forever. 
Then the milestone of forty kicked in and something triggered inside me. There are only twenty-four hours in a day and one needs to use them wisely. 
Now in my case I know exactly the cause of this trigger. Essentially it was the onset of fatherhood that had ambushed me at thirty-seven and was redefining my persona with each passing moment. However it was only at forty that this realization became intellectually apparent.
Maybe I had blocked it out for a while but now in a brief respite I could contemplate what it truly was. It wasn’t time that was the problem but a deficiency of ‘me-time’ the opportunity to retreat and ‘be alone’ to charge one’s battery and escape even for a while the realities of adulthood. 
Its not that this ‘me-time’ is better than any other time for most of my greatest moments are spent with my family but for somebody who is naturally introverted such ‘me-time’ is critical to my functioning. Supply it at the right amount and I function optimally on all fronts. Take it away and I cease to be the best version of Gavin that I can be. 
So in a sense I place great value on ‘me-time’. It is currency in my life whose value seems to appreciate with age. 
I am sure others feel the same way. It’s a healthy selfishness but one that when all said and done is extremely necessary