Sunday, October 3, 2021

Why has China always been so powerful a country?

 (My answer on Quora)

Actually this isn’t the case.

Within the context of survival as a civilization China has performed remarkably well. Relatively high population numbers and the overwhelming predominance of its Han Chinese core in safeguarding its cultural heritage, have played a significant role for most of its history towards ensuring a residual endurance. However this has been realized at a very great cost.

While the cultural element has taken somewhat of a beating recently under Communist domination, the momentum of centuries of Confucian thought have supplied China with an innate buffering system that has proved largely resilient to radical change (for better or for worse).

More often than not the outsider philosophy or power that has come to dominate China has been forced by necessity to integrate the outside beliefs within the Confucian framework.

The framework tends to stress a necessary meritocracy although this has come at the expense of a tolerance for the type of creative thought that challenges existing orthodoxies. This was reflected in China’s failure to initially grasp the technological drive that defined the First Industrial Revolution. The Japanese to the contrary, during the Meiji Era (1868–1912), did not make the same mistake. Further shortfalls in China were compounded by China’as insularity and top down hierarchy of power.

However the notion of China as a strong political player throughout most of recorded history is one that does mesh with reality. China has on numerous occasions been overrun by foreign invaders. The Yuen dynasty (1271–1368) was set up by the Mongols following a brutal conquest as was the later Qing (1644–1912) who have external Manchurian origins. The latter came at the cost of 25 million lives.

Manchu Conquest source: Historica Wiki Fandom

From 1839 to 1949 China suffered what was called the ‘century of humiliation’. It was defeated in the First and Second Opium Wars (1839–1842 and 1856–1860), lost suzerainty in Vietnam to France as a consequence of the Sino-French war (1884–1885) and had to admit defeat against Japan in the First Sino-Japanese War (1894–1895).

The failure of the Boxer Rebellion (1899–1891) further entrenched foreign trade domination. Indeed for the first half of the Twentieth century China was at the receiving end of growing Japanese territorial gains that followed the Treaty of Versailles. This would persist with the Japanese invasion of Manchuria (1931–1932) that in turn was followed by the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945).

China would recover all territory lost to Japan by 1945 (although it lost Outer Mongolia) however the war is believed to have resulted in 15–22 million casualties.

It is also important to note that China has often been cursed with deadly civil wars that have produced extremely high death counts and wreaked havoc with its economy for decades afterward.

The threeway struggle between the Han and Wang Mang usurpers and Red Eyebrow rebels likely cost ten million lives between 9 and 24 CE. The later war between the Three Kingdoms (Wu, Wei and Shu) added another 3.4 million to the death count between 189–230 CE, The An Lushan Rebellion (756–763) caused a drop in the population by 36 million souls.

These continued throughout Chinese history with the Fang La Rebellion (1120–1122, 2 million dead) and the Mongol invasion (1162–1227, 40 million death toll).

The Fall of the Yuan Empire between 1340–1370 added 30 million deaths to the dark side of China’s historical ledger. Between 1755–1757 the Central Asian Sino-Dzungar war cost 600,000 lives. However this figure pales in comparison to the mass killings associated with the Taiping Rebellion of 1850–1864, that ultimately saw the defeat of the Taiping rebels at the hands of the Manchu forces, although not before the loss of a further 20 million lives.

The Taiping Rebellion source: Grunge

The Hui Rebellion (1862–1873), that engulfed Gansu Province between 1862–1873 took 640,000 lives as Han Chinese forces battled Hui Muslims.

To this we can add the mass death tolls suffered under Mao Zedong's CCP regime (Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution) between 1949–1976 whose human toll sits in the neighborhood of 40 million lives. This of course followed the Chinese Civil (1927–1949) where casualty figures likely surpassed the 15 million mark (although there is substantial overlap between the number supplied here and losses incurred in the contemporary Second Sino -Japanese War

So while on the surface China has portrayed a veneer of strength once the curtain of simplicity is removed the history depicts a disturbing timeline of humanitarian and political disasters that demand attention in a deeper analysis.

Source:

Death Toll Numbers

The Great Big Book of Horrible Things
Evangelists of human progress meet their opposite in Matthew White's epic examination of history's one hundred most violent events, or, i...
China's Bloody Century
China's Bloody Century By R.J. Rummel New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 1991. Truth should be told and the fact[s] be faced ----Thomas Hardy. A Plaint to Man CONTENTS Figures and Tables Preface Acknowledgments 1. Introduction and Overview [ China's Bloody Century ] I. TRANSFORMATION AND THE NATIONALIST STRUGGLE, 1900 TO SEPTEMBER 1949 2. 105,000 Victims: Dynastic and Republican China 3. 632,000 Victims: Warlord China 4. 2,724,000 Victims: The Nationalist Period 5. 10,216,000 Victims: The Sino-Japanese War 6. 3,949,000 Victims: Japanese Mass Murder in China 7. 4,968,000 Victims: The Civil War II. THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA 8. The People's Republic of China: Overview 9. 8,427,000 Victims: The Totalization Period 10.7,474,000 Victims: Collectivization and "The Great Leap Forward" 11. 10,729,000 Victims: The Great Famine and Retrenchment Period 12. 7,731,000 Victims: The "Cultural Revolution" 13. 874,000 Victims: Liberalization Methodological Appendix References Index IMPORTANT NOTE: Among all the democide estimates appearing in this book, I have revised two upward. I have changed that for Mao's famine, 1958-1962, from zero to 38,000,000. And thus I have had to change the overall democide for the PRC (1928-1987) from 38,702,000 to 76,702,000. Details here. FIGURES AND TABLES FIGURES Figure 1.1 . China: Accumulative Low, Mid, And High Genocide, 1900-1987 Figure 1.2 . Sources Of Chinese Deaths 1900-1987: Democide, Famine, War And Rebellions Figure 1.3 . Comparisons Of Chinese Democide Figure 1.4 . Accumulated Democide: China Versus Soviet Union Figure 1.5 . China Versus Soviet Democide Figure 1.6 . China's Democide And Annual Rate By Period Figure 1.7 . Nationalist Vs. Communist Annual Democide Rate Figure 1.8 . Annual Risk Of A Chinese Citizen Being Murdered By Their Government In Comparison To Some Other Death Risks. Figure 6.1. Japanese Democide In China: Range Figure 6.2. Sino-Japanese War Deaths FIGURE 8.1: PRC Democide Range FIGURE 8.2: PRC Democide and Annual Death Rate by Period FIGURE 8.3: PRC Democide by Source FIGURE 8.4: PRC Democide, Famine, and War and Rebellion Deaths by Period TABLES Table 1.1 . China's Democide, Famine, And War And Rebellions Dead, 1900-1987 Table 1.2 . Comparisons Of Chinese Democide Table 1.3 . China: Period And Annual Democide Rates (%) Table 1.A . Estimates, Sources, And Calculations, 1900 To 1987 Table 2.A . Estimates, Sources, And Calculations, 1900 To 1916 Table 3.A . Estimates, Sources, And Calculations, 1917 To 1928 Table 4.A . Estimates, Sources, And Calculations, 1929 To June, 1937 Table 5.A . Estimates, Sources, And Calculations, July, 1937 To August, 1945 Table 6.1 . Japanese Democide In China Table 6.2 . Sino-Japanese War Deaths Table 6.A . Estimates, Sources, And Calculations, July, 1937 To August, 1945 Table 7.A . Estimates, Sources, And Calculations, Septem

5 Of The 10 Deadliest Wars Began In China
China's long, bloody march towards becoming a stable, centralized state

No comments: