Friday, December 29, 2017

Western History 61: What was the Significance of Scholasticism?

Scholasticism was both a philosophy as well as a method of learning that attempted to defend Christian Church dogma with reason and logic. It was dominant in the universities of the middle ages and has its origins going back to the late 8th century. It can be divided into a variety of sub-groupings that even had revivals as late at the 19th century.
The two key Scholastic movements that were dominant prior to the Renaissance were Early Scholasticism (8th-12th century) and High Scholasticism (13th-14th century).

The former is often known as the Carolingian Renaissance and is contemporary with the early modern middle ages. Knowledge was spread through the mechanism of the monastic order and there was a strong revival and indeed rediscovery of the Greek theological tradition. Key figures of the early movement include Johannes Scotus, Peter Abelard, Archbishop Anselm of Canterbury and Lafranc of Canterbury.

High Scholasticism placed a greater emphasis on Mathematics and Science. There were more rigorous interpretations of Platonic and Aristotelian philosophy and strong rationalism played a key role in the typical analysis. Francis of Assisi, Bonaventure, Duns Scotus, Peter Auriol, William of Ockham (of Ockham Razor fame) and Thomas Aquinas were key thinkers to emerge from this tradition.

Aquinas was a proponent of natural theology and wrote extensively on ethics, metaphysics, natural law and political theory. His concept of the Just War as defined below and remains to this day a central feature in the philosophy underpinning the defence of the democracies:
First, war must occur for a good and just purpose rather than the pursuit of wealth or power.
Second, just war must be waged by a properly instituted authority such as the state.
Third, peace must be a central motive even in the midst of violence.

In addition Aquinas’ five proofs of God outlined below are key attributes of Western theological thought and by virtue of their implications are essential metrics in debates about the existence of a higher power.
1.    Motion: Some things undoubtedly move, though cannot cause their own motion. Since, as Thomas believed, there can be no infinite chain of causes of motion, there must be a First Mover that is not moved by anything else, and this is what everyone understands by God.
2.    Causation: As in the case of motion, nothing can cause itself, and an infinite chain of causation is impossible, so there must be First cause, called God.
3.    Existence of necessary and the unnecessary: Our experience includes things certainly existing but apparently unnecessary. Not everything can be unnecessary, for then once there was nothing and there would still be nothing. Therefore, we are compelled to suppose something that exists necessarily, having this necessity only from itself; in fact itself the cause for other things to exist.
4.    Gradation: If we can notice a gradation in things in the sense that some things are more hot, good, etc., there must be a superlative that is the truest and noblest thing, and so most fully existing. This then, we call God

5.    Ordered tendencies of nature: A direction of actions to an end is noticed in all bodies following natural laws. Anything without awareness tends to a goal under the guidance of one who is aware. This we call God

No comments: