The early decline of the Roman Empire was hinted at during the turbulent reigns of Caligula, Nero and Domitian. However the era of the Good Emperors provided a much necessary respite that would unfortunately not continue. Commodus, the son of Marcus Arurelius was a poor and malicious ruler. Septimus Severus, founder of the Severan dynasty took power in 193 CE (the Year of the Five Emperors).
By 235 CE the military was in effective control of the Imperial office but it administered an Empire that was fragmenting. As of 268 CE the Empire was now a composite of three parts – The Gallic Empire (Provinces of Spain, Britannia and Hispania), the Palmyrene Empire (Syria, Palestina and Egypt) and the Italian portion.
Strong leaders like Aurelian (270 –274 CE), the famed
soldier Emperor temporarily reunited the portions but it was only under
Diocletian that a solution for resolving the power dynamics was implemented.
Known as the Tetrachy – rule of four, the model of power
sharing divided the Empire into two parts – East and West. Each part would have
their own emperor and a junior emperor (the official successor) for a total of
four rulers overall. The major emperors were also known as the Augusti
and the methodology behind the re-design was to ensure that Emperors would
succeed on merit.
Roman territory was also further sub-divided for administration purposes into more
manageable units but these changes seemed more to cover up a system in decline
than actually reverse the trend. Infighting would rear its head and the Empire
struggled with economic inflation that was poorly handled by wage and price
fixing. At the same time Diocletian upped his persecution of the Christians and
demanded that soldiers of the Christian faith take up a Roman God. This act
further impacted a system in deterioration.
No comments:
Post a Comment